<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reality is a conversation &#8211; Part I &#8211; The known</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.heavymetta.ca/2010/01/16/reality-is-a-conversation-part-i-the-known/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.heavymetta.ca/2010/01/16/reality-is-a-conversation-part-i-the-known/</link>
	<description>How good can you stand it?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:47:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: einajs</title>
		<link>http://www.heavymetta.ca/2010/01/16/reality-is-a-conversation-part-i-the-known/comment-page-1/#comment-4343</link>
		<dc:creator>einajs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heavymetta.ca/?p=860#comment-4343</guid>
		<description>Are you kidding, Roger?  Collect the whole set!  But wait, there&#039;s more!! :) Thanks Mom and Hope...I&#039;m working on the next instalment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you kidding, Roger?  Collect the whole set!  But wait, there&#8217;s more!! <img src='http://www.heavymetta.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Thanks Mom and Hope&#8230;I&#8217;m working on the next instalment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sannie McInnis</title>
		<link>http://www.heavymetta.ca/2010/01/16/reality-is-a-conversation-part-i-the-known/comment-page-1/#comment-4336</link>
		<dc:creator>Sannie McInnis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heavymetta.ca/?p=860#comment-4336</guid>
		<description>Nicely posited, Sjanie.  I&#039;m reading a book which serendipitously concerns all the same questions.  It&#039;s called &quot;Is God a Mathemetician&quot;(can&#039;t remember the author right now).  When I&#039;m done with it I will send it to you. It spends a lot of time on the big philosophical kafuffles that ensued when Euclidean geometry was questioned. I&#039;m looking forward to part II.
Love,
Mom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicely posited, Sjanie.  I&#8217;m reading a book which serendipitously concerns all the same questions.  It&#8217;s called &#8220;Is God a Mathemetician&#8221;(can&#8217;t remember the author right now).  When I&#8217;m done with it I will send it to you. It spends a lot of time on the big philosophical kafuffles that ensued when Euclidean geometry was questioned. I&#8217;m looking forward to part II.<br />
Love,<br />
Mom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hope</title>
		<link>http://www.heavymetta.ca/2010/01/16/reality-is-a-conversation-part-i-the-known/comment-page-1/#comment-4327</link>
		<dc:creator>Hope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 23:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heavymetta.ca/?p=860#comment-4327</guid>
		<description>if the devil is in the details, then maybe god is in the process...

    Was reading an interview with biology-theorist Rupert Sheldrake; his new book examines the idea of beings with a consciousness more elevated than humans. It&#039;s the new Sleeping Beauty: are we the smartest beings in the universe? we ask our own reflection (&#039;cuz we likes the way we thinks). &quot;An improbable assumption,&quot; Sheldrake answers, instead positing a consciousness that pervades the cosmos: galaxy consciousness, solar system consciousness. All très tantric.

    Even more fetchingly though, he assures that nature&#039;s laws are not fixed--they&#039;re more habits than laws, he states--and those constants to which we fervently cling, are here today, gone tomorrow (if tomorrow were a billion or a hundred billion years, I&#039;m assuming). The eternal universe is evolving, as the cosmos itself evolves...which may go to show that humanity&#039;s search for immutability may be the only universal constant.    

     I found this lack of any true constant kinda reassuring: it seems all of a piece to have the cosmos be utterly, radically free of formulae, to have change underlie everything, where &quot;laws&quot; are simply currents that flow this way for an eon or two, then veer. And consciousness keeps the pace, ever-evolving, since it can&#039;t be found isolation, but only in interaction, in a knowing together. Thus, the need for the reverberation of conversation--thanks, Sjanie, for starting one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if the devil is in the details, then maybe god is in the process&#8230;</p>
<p>    Was reading an interview with biology-theorist Rupert Sheldrake; his new book examines the idea of beings with a consciousness more elevated than humans. It&#8217;s the new Sleeping Beauty: are we the smartest beings in the universe? we ask our own reflection (&#8217;cuz we likes the way we thinks). &#8220;An improbable assumption,&#8221; Sheldrake answers, instead positing a consciousness that pervades the cosmos: galaxy consciousness, solar system consciousness. All très tantric.</p>
<p>    Even more fetchingly though, he assures that nature&#8217;s laws are not fixed&#8211;they&#8217;re more habits than laws, he states&#8211;and those constants to which we fervently cling, are here today, gone tomorrow (if tomorrow were a billion or a hundred billion years, I&#8217;m assuming). The eternal universe is evolving, as the cosmos itself evolves&#8230;which may go to show that humanity&#8217;s search for immutability may be the only universal constant.    </p>
<p>     I found this lack of any true constant kinda reassuring: it seems all of a piece to have the cosmos be utterly, radically free of formulae, to have change underlie everything, where &#8220;laws&#8221; are simply currents that flow this way for an eon or two, then veer. And consciousness keeps the pace, ever-evolving, since it can&#8217;t be found isolation, but only in interaction, in a knowing together. Thus, the need for the reverberation of conversation&#8211;thanks, Sjanie, for starting one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.heavymetta.ca/2010/01/16/reality-is-a-conversation-part-i-the-known/comment-page-1/#comment-4326</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 06:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heavymetta.ca/?p=860#comment-4326</guid>
		<description>Proto-hippies = worst. action figures. ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proto-hippies = worst. action figures. ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
